Do you deny that there was a can of whoopass opened on the British?
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
SaeliaSantori |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Yes it was. Good job, Bane!
Do you deny that there was a can of whoopass opened on the British?
Signature by Judd Hunter |
|||
Darth Phantom |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Happy 233rd Birthday America!
|
|||
Bane Nathos |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
By can of whoopass you mean French Artillery yes it was
![]() |
|||
Darth Phantom |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Do we really need to turn this into a debate?
So what is everyone doing for the holiday?
|
|||
Bane Nathos |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Sitting on my ass destressing my mom and sister just went to the parade
![]() |
|||
TK 9125 |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Working....
>.< I have to work 3p to 11:30p tonight. But, it's time and a half pay so that's cool. |
|||
Darth Phantom |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
I have to work 130 to 900 tonight, but I should be able to make the fireworks at the rodeo. I think they start at 9 or 10.
|
|||
Phylis Alince |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Happy birthday, you Yanks.
Sig thanks to Angel Hawkmoon |
|||
Bane Nathos |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
YANKEE DOODLE WENT TO DOWN RIDING ON A PONY! STUCK A FEATHER IN HIS CAP AND CALLED IT MACARONI!
![]() |
|||
Claus von Pellaeon |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Just opted out of going to a fourth of July celebration. Not feeling too well but happy fourth to everyone on TGC! Have real good one!
|
|||
Taer Lyn Pall |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Thank the French for your independance.
|
|||
Bane Nathos |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Of course and they thank us for the Rise of Napoleon oh we also thank them for the Statue of Liberty
![]() |
|||
Corringath Ventraas |
Re: Happy 4th of July! | ||
|
Oh Yankee Doodle - one of the best cases of 'taking it back' ever, ever.
![]() |
|||
General Ceel |
Re: ARCHIVE | ||
|
bump
Join, visit, or advertise your board at the oldest, largest, and most respected Star Wars community on Yuku/Ezboard: The Gungan Council since 1999. What is 1138? |
|||
Jameris Malak |
Re: The Fine Lines | ||
|
Well hopefully they will check the records, see that he made a 911 call and drop some of the charges.
|
|||
Mak Manto |
Re: The Fine Lines | ||
|
The sad thing is, the town will most likely address the issue of no street lamps, and try to come up with a plan for one.
Only after someone is hurt or if they die, they then go into action... Well, I'm hope your friend is found innocent, Skip. Keep us updated on this.
|
|||
Jameris Malak |
Re: Evolution: Discussion, NOT debate | ||
|
Yes we do assimilate slow change into our societys but the only problem is which way are we changing. Are our societies slowly assimilating positive traits of
a social heirarchy or negative traits? To be honest with you, I see more negative traits being assimilated then positive in this day and age. So yes, our
societies will be slowly changing over many many years but the direction still has to be to the choosing of the people who live in the society. Like I said, we
make society, we are society. There is not society and people, society is people. As every people change inherently every society will change, because
we are the society.
This is simple, societal change is so simple, and this really is the choice, knowledge, fear, and obligation of many people. Many people must hold on to what they have and I feel capitalism is always going to be the most popular form of economy from now on, most likely the whole world will end up capitalist at some point and how our economy is run changes interactions between people greatly. Capitalism must exploit to work, that's where profit comes from. There is no compassion in capitalism and I see our world becoming so discompassionate, and people are becoming so detached from each other. "I'm your boss, you treat me like this." "I'm your manager, you call me this." We build these heirarchal structures which basically are the equivalant of a caste system if anyone was serious enough to open their eyes and just see what we are doing to ourselves. I know this is how companies must be run but we build these egos, these superpowerful ridiculously rich moguls who make lobbyists and puppet politicians jump up and down in congress on their strings to screw everyone else over and give them the best opportunity to gain revenues. So to answer your question, yes we will change slowly over time. But to which extent are we changing? Everyone is so secretive, greedy, jealous, etc etc. We are breeding people this way in our society! I'm not saying material goods aren't good, I enjoy watching a TV program like anybody else, but somewhere along the lines of our societal and mental evolution humans picked up the perceptions that "owning" an object makes you something special....when really, you can't technically own anything. Ownership like most other things is just a trick you play on your mind to make yourself feel at ease. "I own this house, I can never lose it." False. Tomorrow a tornado could come and blow it away. All existance has to interact and use its environment for survival but now humans view our surrounding environments and objects we own as a definition of what our life is. This really scares me, I don't want to see our society falling farther into these trends. Sorry, half of this really has nothing to do with your topic.....sorry. >_< |
|||
Jameris Malak |
Re: The Fine Lines | ||
|
We don't need more street lights, there is enough light pollution blocking ones view of the cosmos at night. What we need is for people to start accepting
that accidents happen and that something does not ALWAYS have to be "someones fault". Sometimes things just happen, people die. But one would guess
nobody wants to accept the fact of reality that your death is inherited at the moment of your birth. If it wasn't for pain and pleasure, one would not know
they are alive and it is from these pains and pleasures we are able to learn what we like and dislike. Some people DO like pain. Some people don't like
pain.
The moral of the story is, it's as much the bikers fault as the drivers. Who bicycles late at night in the pitch black? And if you are going to bicycle late at night in the dark like that, you should accept the fact you might get hit by a car. Make "smart"(stupid) decisions and expect "good"(bad) results. I mean really, when I ride my bike I know when a car is coming and if the road is small and dark - PULL OVER AND LET IT PASS. But like most idiots the biker probably had headphones on, which is even more stupid if you ask me. |
|||
Jessan Solo |
Re: The Fine Lines | ||
|
You guys are all working under the assumption that the farmer is telling the truth...
Last time I checked, when faced with the enormous gravity of manslaughter charges and possible imprisonment, to escape consequences people might...lie? Why, if he was going through a rural area, the farmer did not have his foglights on in pitch black is beyond me, let alone not being able to see the biker in the first place (who I am going to assume was wearing either something fluorescent that would reflect off the lights or had his blinkers on), or why the biker decided to ride straight at the light-spewing moving car... Being a skeptic, my guess is either a couple of beers messed with his perception (I've seen people get tipsy off just a single beer, specially if they have not eaten for a bit - having alcohol in your system is plain bad when trying to defend against these type of charges), or he had more than just 'a couple', hit the cyclist, freaked out and fled, the was brought back by his conscious and arrested. *shrugs* If he is innocent, then all the best and I hope found Not Guilty. If he's not, then his negligence cost another person their life, and deserves whats coming. |
|||
Jameris Malak |
Re: The Fine Lines | ||
|
Well that's why I said they should check the phone records. If he did call the emergency 911 number then AT LEAST the hit and run charge should be dropped.
That's all I was saying.
|
|||
EPIII: ROTS 10th Anniversary: